Radiesse - Patients ask, Dr. Ringpfeil answers
Please feel free to use the blog below to share information about Radiesse or to ask Dr. Franziska Ringpfeil a question that might be of interest to others.
Philadelphia and Mainline Center of Dermatology and Cosmetic Surgery
- Medical dermatology
- Medical Dermatology
- Popular Treatments
- More Treatments
- Actinic Keratosis
- Alopecia Areata
- AviClear Acne Laser
- Basal Cell Cancer
- Brown spots
- Dermatosis P. Nigra
- Dry Skin - Xerosis
- Eczema Atopic Dermatitis
- East Asian Dermatology
- Ethnic Dermatology
- Hemangioma
- Herpes simplex
- Hives - Urticaria
- Hyperhidrosis (Sweat)
- Impetigo
- Keratosis Pilaris
- Lupus
- Melanoma
- Melasma
- Mohs Surgery
- Molluscum
- Nail Fungus
- Poison ivy
- Port Wine Stains
- Rashes
- Shingles
- Skin Cancer
- Vitiligo
- Seborrheic Keratoses
- Cosmetic dermatology
- SHOP
- About us
- Contact
Written by Dr. Ringpfeil
Radiesse
Overview:
Calcium hydroxyapatite is a synthetic compound that serves not only as a filler but also as a volumizer, thereby increasing durability.
Expected results:
Correction of static intermediate and deep lines on the lower and mid face, cheek augmentation, correction of scars, volume replenishment for hand rejuvenation.
Preparations:
Avoidance of aspirin and ibuprofen for 10 days. Local anesthesia by injection makes the procedure more comfortable when used around the mouth and in cheeks.
Post treatment instructions:
Avoidance of aspirin or ibuprofen for 3 days.
Time to desired results:
1-3 days
Duration of desired effects:
12-18 months
Contraindications:
Allergy to calcium hydroxy-apatite (extremely rare)
Downtime:
1-3 days of swelling and erythema, up to 7 days for bruising (may be covered easily).
Selected Patient Questions and Answers
# of surveys: 4187
Last updated: 1/02/2024 11:10 AM
PATIENT RATINGS
Would you recommend us?
- definitely
- 93.1%
- probably
- 6.16%
- maybe
- 0.58%
- not likely
- 0.08%
- no
- 0.02%
Compare our service to other similar practices
- excellent
- 87.9%
- very good
- 10.1%
- good
- 1.8%
- poor
- 0.06%
- very poor
- 0%
Overall doctor performance
- excellent
- 94.2%
- very good
- 4.89%
- good
- 0.80%
- poor
- 0.03%
- very poor
- 0%
The doctor listened to you attentively
- excellent
- 93.9%
- very good
- 4.97%
- good
- 1.05%
- poor
- 0.05%
- very poor
- 0%
The doctor took time to answer your questions
- excellent
- 94.0%
- very good
- 4.66%
- good
- 1.27%
- poor
- 0.02%
- very poor
- 0%
The doctor explained treatment options
- excellent
- 94.3%
- very good
- 4.16%
- good
- 1.25%
- poor
- 0.14%
- very poor
- 0.02%
The doctor explained treatment options
- excellent
- 92.0%
- very good
- 5.69%
- good
- 2.18%
- poor
- 0.11%
- very poor
- 0.0%
Front desk performance
- excellent
- 85.6%
- very good
- 10.2%
- good
- 3.66%
- poor
- 0.31%
- very poor
- 0.08%
Aesthetician performance
- excellent
- 88.6%
- very good
- 7.61%
- good
- 3.39%
- poor
- 0.24%
- very poor
- 0.08%
Office comfort
- excellent
- 90.9%
- very good
- 6.93%
- good
- 2.08%
- poor
- 0.05%
- very poor
- 0.05%
Parking
- excellent
- 66.4%
- very good
- 14.4%
- good
- 15.7%
- poor
- 2.49%
- very poor
- 0.9%
Friendliness of the staff during appointment
- excellent
- 90.9%
- very good
- 7.23%
- good
- 1.85%
- poor
- 0.05%
- very poor
- 0%
What WE DID WELL
(Answers:674)
Information provided by doctor.
#12025-05-04friendly, laid-back style yet factual and to-the-point feedback
#22025-04-04The information provided by the physician was very helpful and useful. I would gladly do what she recommended.
#32025-11-25Doctor was very direct and specific on probable course of treatment and potential effectiveness.
#42025-07-03The openness and friendliness. The doctor was very careful to make sure I understood. Thanks. The fact that you urged me to come back for an annual exam I consider very kind and caring.
#52010-11-29 11:47:11Everything was great!
#62025-10-28Being treated promptly
#72010-12-22 09:39:41filling out the patient form on the computer is excellent and much better than the paper forms usually used for doctors; extremely efficient interaction with the staff and doctor; gorgeous waiting room!
#82011-12-14 08:52:39very professional
#92010-11-30 07:53:54A good service
#102025-05-23What can we do better?
(answers:373)
Please consider offering more appointments after 5pm since it can be a challenge to take time off from work.
#12025-06-27please make a reminder call. I checked my cell for one and you hadn't.
#22025-07-03The restroom could be cleaner.
#32011-01-19 08:56:51I think that you should just mkae the vists a little bit quicker, and thats all.
#42010-10-27 08:46:34Everything was very clean and I cannot think of much you could do better.
#52025-09-26I am very satisfied now.
#62026-02-19I was very happy with the care I received.
#72010-09-14 10:44:00I have no suggestions. I am very pleased with ever aspect of my care
#82010-10-18 16:25:51Your rain spouts put water into the driveway to the back parking lot. As it gets colder, it will freeze and create a dangerous pathway for clients
#92010-12-13 11:23:03Can't imagine any better first impression.
#102011-02-24 14:49:37
Hi Dr. R, I am interested in Radiesse (or any other filler) for my jaw line. It is not very prominent and from the side it appears to disappear into my neck. I am not overweight but it makes me look that way. Can enhancement be done with fillers? If so, which do you recommend best and how many units would be needed (on average)?
A face must be seen from multiple angles in order to determine what strategy is the best to address a specific concern. Often, lifting and recountouring go hand in hand to achieve this goal. Certain fillers are better for lift others are better for reflation and contouring. Simple recountouring may require 1-2 syringes whereas a liquid face lift easily consumes 1 syringes. In office evaluation is needed for discussion of expectations, side effects and a cost estimate.